I am going to resume posting on my previous 3 week intervals as of next week; emphasis on Multtiple Sclerosis
.
In the meantime I will publi here an excellent summary arguing against forced vaccination by Dr. S. Marcy. Work in Progress.
I (Dr. S. Marcy) am sending you the video link below because it is a clear and brief (30 min) discussion delivered by Dr. Ryan Cole, a reputable researcher, about the science of virology, the nature of the COVID vaccinations and the rising health issues surrounding their use. As a scientist I hear statistics that are meaningful. We need an honest discussion of the facts and step away from the story, the fear, and lack of logic. I look beyond rhetoric to find facts. The continued vilification of non-vaccinated people is of great concern. Forcing people to be vaccinated to be in society is of serious concern. We need to ask the correct questions to assess value.
Have people, including children, been harmed by the vaccine? YES
Do we have any way to assess potential long term harm? NO
Are pharmaceutical companies taking responsibility for harm? NO
Is the NIAID tracking harm and clearly communicating harm? NO
Is the vaccine preventing infection? NO
Is the vaccine preventing spread? NO
Do "leaky" vaccines promote mutations and variants? YES
This does not add up well in my view.
I personally know how money and power compromises science. Since I earned my Ph.D. in 1981 I've seen how the desperate scramble for research funding has altered the ethics of too many scientists. The more I read now the more I realize how much this has occurred in the pharmaceutical arena. The hope for patents has been particularly harmful for ethics in science-especially in medicine. Politics too.
I was at EPA when scientists were asked by the Bush Administration to change their results on climate research, and were given the choice of either changing the results or not publishing. I am proud to report that the scientists opted to not publish, but what a loss to them and all of us. Now there are billions of dollars on the line in the current use of the COVID vaccine being delivered under emergency authorization. There are powerful people making a great deal of money, billions and billions.
I was on a National Science Foundation (NSF) review panel for research proposal evaluation and saw how the "old boy network" influenced grant funding. I protested. I wasn't asked to serve more than twice...
The vaccine is a money maker and is only being delivered under emergency authorization. If there were a cheap and easy treatment, all that would end, particularly given the rising evidence of harm by the vaccine and potential unknown harm in the future.
For those who automatically discount the value of Ivermectin and Hydroxychloraquine because they were "scientifically discredited," it is time to look at the facts. The studies used to discredit Hydroxychloroquine were at high doses and did not use recommended protocols, thus so poorly done they caused harm. The key Lancet paper was subsequently retracted...but the narrative was not. NIAID will not fund research for these two drugs and even though they are both well vetted and safe medications, off-label treatment for COVID is being blocked. Thus, only small studies and results reported by physicians helping their patients are available.
The clamor for double-blind studies, while normally appropriate, are not in this case because we have NO well designed double-blind studies for the vaccine and the studies that were started were stopped prematurely with mounting evidence of adverse effects. Look at the data. This is where we need to clamor for scientifically sound research.
Meta Analysis of Ivermectin using what limited data we have is very encouraging. Ask yourself why we did not try these drugs first and still won't. These are safe medications well vetted around the world, they both function as ionophores, they have multiple other modes of action resulting in antiviral and anti-inflammatory outcomes. They are also cheap, no longer under patent, and were widely available until COVID-19 vaccinations were pushed through for emergency authorization. If a treatment is found effective the vaccines will automatically lose their emergency authorization
I respect all those who want the vaccine and boosters. I also ask that you please take the time to listen carefully to this video. It is not perfect, nothing is. But it may perhaps peak your interest enough to learn more about vaccines, adverse effects, alternative treatments and a reconsideration of the current narrative, the fear, the blame being leveled at those not getting vaccinated.
Yes I am vaccinated. I do not intend to get a booster. Instead I have Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine ready to use. I've learned a great deal since I decided to be vaccinated one year ago. Since the vaccine does not prevent infection nor transmission of the disease, COVID is NOT a disease of the unvaccinated. We need early and effective treatments and they are available. Let's use them.
Video: US clinical pathologist Dr. Ryan Cole describes a significant post-vaccination increase in certain types of cancer. German pathologists also noted the issue of post-vaccination immune dysregulation and sudden tumor growth in some patients.
Dr Ryan Cole on post-vaccination cancer (full video)
Dr. S. Marcy.
Tags: Dr Ryan Cole, Covid Vaccination, Hydroxychloroquine, Ivermectin, Endometrial Cancer, Neurological disease, Heart disease, Natural Immunity, Moral/Religious Objections, Medical Contra-indications
.
In the meantime I will publi here an excellent summary arguing against forced vaccination by Dr. S. Marcy. Work in Progress.
I (Dr. S. Marcy) am sending you the video link below because it is a clear and brief (30 min) discussion delivered by Dr. Ryan Cole, a reputable researcher, about the science of virology, the nature of the COVID vaccinations and the rising health issues surrounding their use. As a scientist I hear statistics that are meaningful. We need an honest discussion of the facts and step away from the story, the fear, and lack of logic. I look beyond rhetoric to find facts. The continued vilification of non-vaccinated people is of great concern. Forcing people to be vaccinated to be in society is of serious concern. We need to ask the correct questions to assess value.
Have people, including children, been harmed by the vaccine? YES
Do we have any way to assess potential long term harm? NO
Are pharmaceutical companies taking responsibility for harm? NO
Is the NIAID tracking harm and clearly communicating harm? NO
Is the vaccine preventing infection? NO
Is the vaccine preventing spread? NO
Do "leaky" vaccines promote mutations and variants? YES
This does not add up well in my view.
I personally know how money and power compromises science. Since I earned my Ph.D. in 1981 I've seen how the desperate scramble for research funding has altered the ethics of too many scientists. The more I read now the more I realize how much this has occurred in the pharmaceutical arena. The hope for patents has been particularly harmful for ethics in science-especially in medicine. Politics too.
I was at EPA when scientists were asked by the Bush Administration to change their results on climate research, and were given the choice of either changing the results or not publishing. I am proud to report that the scientists opted to not publish, but what a loss to them and all of us. Now there are billions of dollars on the line in the current use of the COVID vaccine being delivered under emergency authorization. There are powerful people making a great deal of money, billions and billions.
I was on a National Science Foundation (NSF) review panel for research proposal evaluation and saw how the "old boy network" influenced grant funding. I protested. I wasn't asked to serve more than twice...
The vaccine is a money maker and is only being delivered under emergency authorization. If there were a cheap and easy treatment, all that would end, particularly given the rising evidence of harm by the vaccine and potential unknown harm in the future.
For those who automatically discount the value of Ivermectin and Hydroxychloraquine because they were "scientifically discredited," it is time to look at the facts. The studies used to discredit Hydroxychloroquine were at high doses and did not use recommended protocols, thus so poorly done they caused harm. The key Lancet paper was subsequently retracted...but the narrative was not. NIAID will not fund research for these two drugs and even though they are both well vetted and safe medications, off-label treatment for COVID is being blocked. Thus, only small studies and results reported by physicians helping their patients are available.
The clamor for double-blind studies, while normally appropriate, are not in this case because we have NO well designed double-blind studies for the vaccine and the studies that were started were stopped prematurely with mounting evidence of adverse effects. Look at the data. This is where we need to clamor for scientifically sound research.
Meta Analysis of Ivermectin using what limited data we have is very encouraging. Ask yourself why we did not try these drugs first and still won't. These are safe medications well vetted around the world, they both function as ionophores, they have multiple other modes of action resulting in antiviral and anti-inflammatory outcomes. They are also cheap, no longer under patent, and were widely available until COVID-19 vaccinations were pushed through for emergency authorization. If a treatment is found effective the vaccines will automatically lose their emergency authorization
I respect all those who want the vaccine and boosters. I also ask that you please take the time to listen carefully to this video. It is not perfect, nothing is. But it may perhaps peak your interest enough to learn more about vaccines, adverse effects, alternative treatments and a reconsideration of the current narrative, the fear, the blame being leveled at those not getting vaccinated.
Yes I am vaccinated. I do not intend to get a booster. Instead I have Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine ready to use. I've learned a great deal since I decided to be vaccinated one year ago. Since the vaccine does not prevent infection nor transmission of the disease, COVID is NOT a disease of the unvaccinated. We need early and effective treatments and they are available. Let's use them.
Video: US clinical pathologist Dr. Ryan Cole describes a significant post-vaccination increase in certain types of cancer. German pathologists also noted the issue of post-vaccination immune dysregulation and sudden tumor growth in some patients.
Dr Ryan Cole on post-vaccination cancer (full video)
Dr. S. Marcy.
Tags: Dr Ryan Cole, Covid Vaccination, Hydroxychloroquine, Ivermectin, Endometrial Cancer, Neurological disease, Heart disease, Natural Immunity, Moral/Religious Objections, Medical Contra-indications
RSS Feed