See Lettre ouverte du Professeur Christian Perronne - Le ...www.2012un-nouveau-paradigme.com/2020/12/lettre...christian-perronne.html
Le 1er décembre, le Professeur Christian Perronne publiait une lettre ouverte pour dénoncer le cauchemar que vit la France depuis des mois et donner son expertise à propos des vaccins. Cette lettre ouverte a été publiée sur le site bonsens.info. Translation with the help of Reverso.
France, which has been living a nightmare for months, is waking up. In many cities of our beautiful country, the people are marching to regain their freedom, to demand the return of democracy. As a doctor, specialist in infectious diseases and having been president of numerous public health bodies or councils, including on vaccines, I measure every day the uncertainties generating the fear and the growing disarray of our fellow citizens. I take the risk of being again qualified as a "conspirator" or better still as "reassurance", terms designating those who criticize or challenge the single thought. I end up being proud of these names, my words of truth having never changed since the start of the epidemic. I therefore consider that it is my responsibility to express myself again today on the entire medical aspect of Covid-19 and in particular on the vaccine subject, now the central and almost unique element of the policy of state health. Many French people have been hypnotized by the politics of fear. Since September 2020, we have been told of a second terrible wave of the epidemic, worse than the first. The Minister of Health, Dr Olivier Véran, the President of the Scientific Council of the Elysée, Prof. Jean François Delfraissy, the Director General of Health, Prof. Jérôme Salomon, the Institute Pasteur have announced catastrophic figures with an exponential increase in the death toll. Hospitals had to be saturated and overwhelmed. Even the President of the Republic, during a recent televised address announcing the reconfinement, predicted no less than 400,000 deaths, adding to the 200,000 deaths estimated shortly before by Professor Arnaud Fontanet de Pasteur. These unrealistic numbers had only one purpose, to fuel fear to keep us confined, wisely masked. However, the widespread use of masks in the general population has no scientifically demonstrated interest in stemming the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic. The use of masks should be targeted for patients, their entourage (especially those at risk) and caregivers in contact. But the epidemic is on the decline and has not resulted in an apocalypse. The dynamics of the curve had shown for weeks the profile of a seasonal epidemic rebound that is observed with some viruses, once the epidemic wave has ended. This testifies to the adaptation of the virus to humans and is also a reflection of the herd immunity which is growing in the population and which naturally protects us. The strains of viruses currently circulating have lost their virulence. Authorities will not be able to say it was thanks to the lockdown as the downward trend had started even before it was put in place. The epidemic had even started to decline in some towns before the curfew was instituted. Unfortunately, there are still deaths which occur in the very old, the very obese or those suffering from severe diabetes, severe high blood pressure, cardio respiratory or kidney diseases which are already crippling. These people at risk are perfectly identified. Health measures should therefore be targeted to protect, detect and treat them as early as possible from the onset of symptoms with hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin, the efficacy and safety of which are widely confirmed, if the treatment is given. precociously. Many deaths could have been avoided. However, general practitioners and geriatricians have been dissuaded from treating. In this context, continuing to persecute our children behind unnecessary masks remains incomprehensible. All these measures are made so that the French demand a vaccine. So what is the benefit of a generalized vaccine for a disease whose mortality is close to 0.05%? No. This mass vaccination is unnecessary. In addition, the risks of vaccination may be greater than the benefits. The most worrying thing is that many countries, including France, say they are ready to vaccinate in the coming weeks, while the development and evaluation of these products have been rushed and no results the efficacy or the dangerousness of these vaccines has not been published to date. We were only allowed press releases from industrial manufacturers, allowing their shares to soar on the stock market. The worst part is that the first "vaccines" offered to us are not vaccines, but gene therapy products. We're going to inject nucleic acids that will cause parts of the virus to be made by our own cells. We do not know the consequences of this injection at all, as it is a first in humans. What if the cells of some "vaccinees" made too many viral compounds, causing uncontrollable reactions in our bodies?
The first gene therapies will be with RNA, but there are projects with DNA. Normally, in our cells, the message is sent from DNA to RNA, but the reverse is possible in certain circumstances, especially since our human cells have since the dawn of time contain so-called "endogenous" retroviruses integrated into the DNA of our chromosomes. These "domesticated" retroviruses that inhabit us are usually harmless (unlike HIV, AIDS retrovirus for example), but they can produce an enzyme, reverse transcriptase, capable of transcribing backwards, from RNA to DNA. . So an RNA foreign to our body and administered by injection could code for DNA, just as foreign, which can then integrate into our chromosomes. There is therefore a real risk of transforming our genes permanently. There is also the possibility, by modifying the nucleic acids of our eggs or sperm, to transmit these genetic modifications to our children. The people who promote these gene therapies, falsely called “vaccines” are sorcerer's apprentices and take the French and more generally the citizens of the world, for guinea pigs. We do not want to become, like transgenic tomatoes or corn, GMOs (genetically modified organisms). A medical official from one of the pharmaceutical manufacturing companies said a few days ago that he hoped for an effect of personal protection, but that one should not hope too much for an impact on the transmission of the virus, therefore on the dynamics of the 'epidemic. This is a disguised admission that this is not a vaccine. A shame. I am all the more horrified as I have always been in favor of vaccines and have chaired immunization policy bodies for years. Today, we must say stop to this extremely worrying plan. Louis Pasteur must be turning in his grave. Science, medical ethics and above all common sense must take over.
Christian PERRONNE Head of the Infectious and Tropical Diseases Department at Garches Hospital (92) - France
Traditional Vaccines: Russian SputnikV. Chinese SinoVac; British Astra Zeneca
Experimental mRNA Vaccines: American Moderna; British/German PfizerBioNTech
Tags: Hydroxychloroquine; Covid19; Dr Didier Raoult; Dr Christian Perronne; mRNAVaccines; SputnikV; SinoVac, AstraZeneca; Moderna; PfizerBioNTech;